2009 Audi A3 vs. 1965 Pontiac Catalina

To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Catalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Catalina would be higher. At 6,891 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Catalina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (376 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2009 Audi A3. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Catalina should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Pontiac Catalina weights approximately 855 kg more than 2009 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Pontiac Catalina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Catalina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (625 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A3. (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1965 Pontiac Catalina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A3 1965 Pontiac Catalina
Make Audi Pontiac
Model A3 Catalina
Year Released 2009 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 6891 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 200 HP 376 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 625 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 103.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.8 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1885 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 5450 mm
Vehicle Width 1970 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 3080 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]