2009 Audi A3 vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2009 Audi A3. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 590 kg more than 2009 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A3. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A3 | 240 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1948 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 54 L |