2009 Audi A3 vs. 1970 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2009 Audi A3. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1266 kg more than 2009 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A3 | 1970 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A3 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 2196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3390 mm |
