2009 Audi A3 vs. 1972 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,968 cc, 2009 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.

Because 1972 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 2101. 2009 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 1972 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1972 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: