2009 Audi A3 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A3 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A3 | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2160 mm |