2009 Audi A3 vs. 1982 BMW 325

To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1982 BMW 325. (120 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 325 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.

Because 1982 BMW 325 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 325. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 325. (230 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 325. 2009 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 1982 BMW 325 has manual transmission. 1982 BMW 325 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A3 1982 BMW 325
Make Audi BMW
Model A3 325
Year Released 2009 1982
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 2693 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 4250 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1140 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4330 mm
Vehicle Width 1970 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.4 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.7 L/100km 11.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 6.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]