2009 Audi A3 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 200 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1982 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A3 | Omega |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |