2009 Audi A3 vs. 1984 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1984 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1984 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.
Because 1984 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1984 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A3 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |