2009 Audi A3 vs. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2009 Audi A3. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 305 kg more than 2009 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1984 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Audi | Plymouth |
Model | A3 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2009 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 2213 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |