2009 Audi A3 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A3 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A3 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
