2009 Audi A3 vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Audi A3. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 905 kg more than 2009 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A3. (320 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A3 | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | A3 | MM |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 2956 cc |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 106 L |
