2009 Audi A3 vs. 2003 Subaru Outback

To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Outback. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Outback.

Because 2003 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru Outback. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru Outback.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A3 2003 Subaru Outback
Make Audi Subaru
Model A3 Outback
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Hatchback Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 2457 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 165 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 225 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1445 kg 1445 kg
Vehicle Length 4220 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.7 L/100km 8.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 64 L