2009 Audi A3 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Audi A3. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A3 weights approximately 17 kg more than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (200 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A3 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |