2009 Audi A3 vs. 2006 BMW 530

To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 530 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 530 (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2009 Audi A3. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A3.

Because 2006 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 530 (301 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A3. (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A3 2006 BMW 530
Make Audi BMW
Model A3 530
Year Released 2009 2006
Body Type Hatchback Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 254 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 301 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1970 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2840 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 9.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 70 L