2009 Audi A3 vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 499 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.

Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A3 2008 Nissan X-Trail
Make Audi Nissan
Model A3 X-Trail
Year Released 2009 2008
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1968 cc 2486 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 138 HP 0 HP
Torque 320 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81.1 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.5 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.5 seconds 9.9 seconds
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 895 kg 1394 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4650 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.8 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 60 L