2009 Audi A3 vs. 2010 Daewoo Matiz

To start off, 2010 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (50 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A3 weights approximately 179 kg more than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Matiz. 2009 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 2010 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2010 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A3 2010 Daewoo Matiz
Make Audi Daewoo
Model A3 Matiz
Year Released 2009 2010
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 794 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 50 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5900 RPM
Torque 281 Nm 69 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 68.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.8 mm 72 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 851 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 3500 mm
Vehicle Width 1970 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.8 L/100km 6.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 35 L