2009 Audi A4 vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A4 (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 80 kg more than 2009 Audi A4.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi A4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A4 (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A4 | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A4 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2040 mm |