2009 Audi A4 vs. 1967 Dodge Monaco
To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 6,284 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Dodge Monaco (290 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Audi A4. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 732 kg more than 2009 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Dodge Monaco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Dodge Monaco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Dodge Monaco (515 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A4. (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1967 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A4 | 1967 Dodge Monaco | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | A4 | Monaco |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 6284 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 515 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 108 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 85.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1762 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 90 L |