2009 Audi A4 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A4 (161 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne weights approximately 417 kg more than 2009 Audi A4.
Because 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A4. (225 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A4 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A4 | Biscayne |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 98.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 89.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1807 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 87 L |