2009 Audi A4 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,122 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A4 (252 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A4 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A4 (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A4 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A4 | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 3122 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2160 mm |