2009 Audi A4 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A4 (187 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A4 weights approximately 263 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi A4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A4 (240 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A4 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model A4 Tracker
Year Released 2009 2001
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 187 HP 127 HP
Torque 240 Nm 183 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 1187 kg
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2490 mm