2009 Audi A4 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2009 Audi A4. (217 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 215 kg more than 2009 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A4. (300 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A4 | 2003 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A4 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 529 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 66 L |