2009 Audi A4 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2009 Audi A4. (187 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 295 kg more than 2009 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A4. (240 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A4.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A4 2003 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Audi Cadillac
Model A4 CTS-V
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1781 cc 5666 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 187 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 529 Nm
Torque RPM 1950 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 99.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.1:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 1745 kg
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 66 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]