2009 Audi A4 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Audi A4. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 370 kg more than 2009 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A4 (320 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A4 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A4 | Tracker |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 221 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 61 L |