2009 Audi A4 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2009 Audi A4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2009 Audi A4. (208 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A4.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A4 (350 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A4 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A4 | Raider |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 83 L |