2009 Audi A4 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2009 Audi A4 and 2009 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2009 Audi A4. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A4.
Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A4 (250 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A4 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A4 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
