2009 Audi A4 vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi A4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2009 Audi A4.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A4 | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Audi | Fisker |
| Model | A4 | Karma |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 36 L |
