2009 Audi A5 vs. 1970 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2009 Audi A5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A5 (265 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1970 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1970 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 173 kg more than 2009 Audi A5.
Because 2009 Audi A5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Datsun 240Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A5 (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Datsun 240Z. 2009 Audi A5 has automatic transmission and 1970 Datsun 240Z has manual transmission. 1970 Datsun 240Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A5 | 1970 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Audi | Datsun |
Model | A5 | 240Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3197 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |