2009 Audi A5 vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2009 Audi A5 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A5 weights approximately 565 kg more than 1979 Mazda 626.
Because 2009 Audi A5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A5 | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | A5 | 626 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2965 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 237 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |
