2009 Audi A5 vs. 1983 Bitter SC
To start off, 2009 Audi A5 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A5 (187 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Bitter SC. (177 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1983 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A5 weights approximately 225 kg more than 1983 Bitter SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A5 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Bitter SC. (248 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A5 | 1983 Bitter SC | |
Make | Audi | Bitter |
Model | A5 | SC |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 248 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 69.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.8:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 75 L |