2009 Audi A5 vs. 1994 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2009 Audi A5 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A5 (265 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1994 Mazda RX-7. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2009 Audi A5.
Because 2009 Audi A5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A5 (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A5 | 1994 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A5 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3197 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 77 L |