2009 Audi A5 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2009 Audi A5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A5 (265 HP) has 195 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A5 weights approximately 155 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Audi A5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A5 (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade. 2009 Audi A5 has automatic transmission and 2004 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2004 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: