2009 Audi A5 vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Audi A5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A5 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A5 weights approximately 545 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi A5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A5 (500 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A5 | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A5 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2965 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 211 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.9 seconds | 6.4 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 61 L |