2009 Audi A5 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi A5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi A5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 265 kg more than 2009 Audi A5.
Because 2009 Audi A5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A5 (331 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A5 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | A5 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 331 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |