2009 Audi A6 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 61 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Hudson Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A6 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Audi | Hudson |
| Model | A6 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3160 mm |
