2009 Audi A6 vs. 1951 Buick 40
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (169 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Because 1951 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A6. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1951 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 1951 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | A6 | 40 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3090 mm |