2009 Audi A6 vs. 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,129 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (342 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A6 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (243 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 1952 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
Make | Audi | Austin-Healey |
Model | A6 | Tickford |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3129 cc | 2441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 243 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2600 mm |