2009 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Audi A6. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2009 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A6 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
