2009 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (221 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 275 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (450 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Audi | Triumph |
Model | A6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |