2009 Audi A6 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2009 Audi A6. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 525 kg more than 2009 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A6 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1779 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
