2009 Audi A6 vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2009 Audi A6. (206 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 430 kg more than 2009 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A6 | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2773 cc | 6952 cc |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |
