2009 Audi A6 vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (300 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (119 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (420 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A6 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2480 mm |