2009 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Austin Allegro
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,773 cc, 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (206 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A6 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Allegro. 2009 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1982 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1982 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 1982 Austin Allegro | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | A6 | Allegro |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2773 cc | 998 cc |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 64.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.4 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2450 mm |