2009 Audi A6 vs. 1994 Nissan 270 R
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan 270 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan 270 R would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan 270 R (270 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2009 Audi A6. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan 270 R should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A6 weights approximately 329 kg more than 1994 Nissan 270 R.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Nissan 270 R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Nissan 270 R (344 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A6. (210 Nm). This means 1994 Nissan 270 R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 1994 Nissan 270 R | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | 270 R |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 344 Nm |
Top Speed | 212 km/hour | 273 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |