2009 Audi A6 vs. 1994 Nissan 270 R
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan 270 R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan 270 R would be higher. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan 270 R (270 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Audi A6. (221 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan 270 R should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A6 weights approximately 559 kg more than 1994 Nissan 270 R.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Nissan 270 R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (450 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Nissan 270 R. (344 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Nissan 270 R.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 1994 Nissan 270 R | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | 270 R |
Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 450 Nm | 344 Nm |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 273 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1300 mm |