2009 Audi A6 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2009 Audi A6. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A6.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (380 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi A6 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A6 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2698 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 228 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1300 mm |
