2009 Audi A6 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 10 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (177 Nm). This means 2009 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 177 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |