2009 Audi A6 vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (342 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 BMW M3. (338 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (355 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A6. (243 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 2002 BMW M3 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | A6 | M3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3129 cc | 3246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 338 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 243 Nm | 355 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 67 L |