2009 Audi A6 vs. 2003 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (342 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2003 Ford F-250. (256 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-250 weights approximately 810 kg more than 2009 Audi A6.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-250 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A6. (243 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 2003 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3129 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 243 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3490 mm |