2009 Audi A6 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZT would be higher. At 2,773 cc, 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (206 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2003 MG ZT. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A6 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2003 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A6. (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A6 | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | A6 | ZT |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2773 cc | 1951 cc |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2760 mm |